4 ms·
But now it's also apparently larger! I'm sure I'm not the only person hoping for an Apple Watch that is reasonably thin and small.
by esfandia 2y ago
But now it's also apparently larger! I'm sure I'm not the only person hoping for an Apple Watch that is reasonably thin and small.
- mistercheph 2y agoMonkey want big shiny rock, not stupid little rock
- zombiwoof 2y agoYou made my day
- geerlingguy 2y agoI'd love that old 38mm watch, but thinner. The problem is more little mini watch apps are adding more functionality / touchable area, to the point it's hard on my older 41mm (I think? Maybe 40?) watch to touch some of the touch areas. I'm guessing most devs use the giant size watches.
- mikestew 2y agoEven Apple themselves are guilty of ridiculously small touch targets these days. Hold the side button until the emergency screen comes up. I defy you to hit the “power off” button on a 40mm watch on the first try. Hell, I have a hard enough time on my AW Ultra with these old eyes.
- jjtheblunt 2y agoagreed : it's worse when your display has a hardware failure, you remember how to try turning it off, and you screw up and trigger an emergency instead, which i've done.
- Nextgrid 2y agoCan’t have as much ads, distractions and other “engagement” features on a small screen.
- Carrok 2y agoI have had an Apple Watch for some time now, and have never once seen a single ad on it. As far as distractions I get only the notifications I want.
- wilsonnb3 2y agoEven the biggest Apple Watch screen is still tiny by any reasonable metric. They aren't filling the extra space with "distractions", they are giving you space for an extra widget or two and making it marginally less painful to type.
- MBCook 2y agoThe if you compare the 45mm series 8 from two years ago and the new 46mm series 10, it’s 1mm wider, 1mm taller, and 1mm thinner. Not much of a change on the other axis. The thickness is mostly notable because that’s about 10% gone.