> am I supposed to be surprised they dont have a 401k? No, you're supposed to be angry that a company that made $1.23 billion in profit has no program in place

> am I supposed to be surprised they dont have a 401k? No, you're supposed to be angry that a company that made $1.23 billion in profit has no program in place for its employees to financially contribute towards the time when they either can't or don't want to work anymore, because that means they're going to be more reliant upon the taxpayer to keep them off the streets when they're old.