4 ms·
Here, for example: https://www.quora.com/Is-LuaJIT-still-faster-than-JavaScript-V8/answer/Rochus-Keller?a https://www.quora.com/Is-LuaJIT-still-faster-than-Java
by pansa2 2y ago
Here, for example: https://www.quora.com/Is-LuaJIT-still-faster-than-JavaScript-V8/answer/Rochus-Keller?a https://www.quora.com/Is-LuaJIT-still-faster-than-JavaScript...
LuaJIT's speed is very impressive, but the optimizations it can use are limited by its desire to remain lightweight.
It's understandable that JavaScript implementations, which don't have that restriction, can use different techniques and work out faster overall.
- imtringued 2y agoI would like to say that something that doesn't get used, doesn't work out faster overall.
- pansa2 2y ago> something that doesn't get used Sorry, you've lost me. What doesn't get used?