4 ms·

> some day we will have AIs running physics experiments that we will barely understand and they will come up with new technology that we will see as magic. Cit

by tazu 2y ago

> some day we will have AIs running physics experiments that we will barely understand and they will come up with new technology that we will see as magic. Citation needed.

urbandw311er 2y ago
Is that some catty way of saying you don’t agree? Maybe you should say why you don’t agree. Hacker News encourages a slightly higher quality of debate than glib remarks like this.
- slowmovintarget 2y ago
  :) The glib response to that "citation needed" is "Sir, or madam, this is not Slashdot."
- xanderlewis 2y ago
  What is there to agree with? The parent comment is an assertion about the future presented without evidence. ‘Citation needed’ might come across as snarky, but it’s a valid point.
  - exe34 2y ago
    Sorry, it seemed pretty obvious to me. I have now added some examples of present day work - Google might be able to help you find more.
- omnicognate 2y ago
  I agree that it's catty, but it's a way of pointing out that the original comment didn't provide any reason to believe the extremely speculative prediction that it stated as fact. That itself is glib, low quality commenting and it seems fair to point it out. There's no onus on the responder to provide a reason for disagreeing when no reason was given to believe the statement in the first place. Debate is hard on the internet, but fortunately it's a temporary inconvenience because in future the infrastructure will be replaced with direct neural connections, turning the entire human race into a single giant mind with one coherent worldview.
exe34 2y ago
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-designs-quantum-physics-experiments-beyond-what-any-human-has-conceived/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-designs-quantu... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OHTMbHCeRw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OHTMbHCeRw https://www.anl.gov/article/autonomous-discovery-defines-the-next-era-of-science https://www.anl.gov/article/autonomous-discovery-defines-the... https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02251 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02251 https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist/ https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603480/ https://thevarsity.ca/2024/01/13/self-driving-labs-how-ai-could-accelerate-scientific-discovery/ https://thevarsity.ca/2024/01/13/self-driving-labs-how-ai-co... Have you heard of Google? I realise that carbon chauvinism is currently edgy, but progress is already being made.

by tazu 2y ago

> some day we will have AIs running physics experiments that we will barely understand and they will come up with new technology that we will see as magic. Citation needed.

urbandw311er 2y ago

Is that some catty way of saying you don’t agree? Maybe you should say why you don’t agree. Hacker News encourages a slightly higher quality of debate than glib remarks like this.

slowmovintarget 2y ago
:) The glib response to that "citation needed" is "Sir, or madam, this is not Slashdot."
xanderlewis 2y ago
What is there to agree with? The parent comment is an assertion about the future presented without evidence. ‘Citation needed’ might come across as snarky, but it’s a valid point.
- exe34 2y ago
  Sorry, it seemed pretty obvious to me. I have now added some examples of present day work - Google might be able to help you find more.
omnicognate 2y ago
I agree that it's catty, but it's a way of pointing out that the original comment didn't provide any reason to believe the extremely speculative prediction that it stated as fact. That itself is glib, low quality commenting and it seems fair to point it out. There's no onus on the responder to provide a reason for disagreeing when no reason was given to believe the statement in the first place. Debate is hard on the internet, but fortunately it's a temporary inconvenience because in future the infrastructure will be replaced with direct neural connections, turning the entire human race into a single giant mind with one coherent worldview.

exe34 2y ago

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-designs-quantum-physics-experiments-beyond-what-any-human-has-conceived/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ai-designs-quantu... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OHTMbHCeRw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OHTMbHCeRw https://www.anl.gov/article/autonomous-discovery-defines-the-next-era-of-science https://www.anl.gov/article/autonomous-discovery-defines-the... https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02251 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.02251 https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist/ https://sakana.ai/ai-scientist/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603480/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK603480/ https://thevarsity.ca/2024/01/13/self-driving-labs-how-ai-could-accelerate-scientific-discovery/ https://thevarsity.ca/2024/01/13/self-driving-labs-how-ai-co... Have you heard of Google? I realise that carbon chauvinism is currently edgy, but progress is already being made.