I'm fairly certain that's often a deciding factor in legal questions? If your originally produced content, without ever having seen the other thing, is substan

I'm fairly certain that's often a deciding factor in legal questions? If your originally produced content, without ever having seen the other thing, is substantially similar to something that already exists, you are much more likely to be in trouble (in the sense that someone will take issue, not in the sense that you can be convicted) than if you copied something existing, and transformed it into something unrecognizable.