4 ms·
Snowden, Assange, China, Russia it's all uncorrelated and a distraction to the "Nothing to hide" argument. You can review it here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w
by aeonik 2y ago
Snowden, Assange, China, Russia it's all uncorrelated and a distraction to the "Nothing to hide" argument.
You can review it here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument
I will also add: that hiding has a very successful track record (for all life forms) over time, because you don't ever really know what the future holds.
I also have a pet theory that there is underlying physics/information theory here that explains this (similar to thermodynamics/entropy, might even be the same phenomenon) ->
too much concentrated asymetric information becomes a single point of failure, and yields brittle systems.
Stated a different way:
As the dependencies on a single process rise, the probability of the entire system failing approaches 1.
- jokoon 2y agowow you're so smart
- aeonik 2y agoBecause I noticed that lying to people constantly, and mass surveillance controlled by a small parties is probably a bad strategy in the long run? I think evolution figured it out a few billion years before me. I think it's just easy to forget. Of course I could be entirely wrong. Just a hypothesis of mine.