4 ms·
> peer-review should not be anonymous How do you prevent movement to an equilibrium where reviewers give favorable reviews to the reviewers of their own papers
by bachmeier 2y ago
> peer-review should not be anonymous
How do you prevent movement to an equilibrium where reviewers give favorable reviews to the reviewers of their own papers?
- vouaobrasil 2y ago> How do you prevent movement to an equilibrium where reviewers give favorable reviews to the reviewers of their own papers? Peer-review of peer review. If all peer review is public, then people can analyse the trends.
- adr1an 2y agoIt's peer reviewers all the way down then ;)