4 ms·
> accurate peer-review and unbiased evaluations And how do you even guarantee this, 'accurate' and 'unbiased'? Any form of peer review will always have a slant
by knighthack 2y ago
> accurate peer-review and unbiased evaluations
And how do you even guarantee this, 'accurate' and 'unbiased'? Any form of peer review will always have a slant, no matter how 'objective' it is intended to be.
Until that can be ascertained, I don't see how peer review is fundamentally superior. I would even argue that peer review can be detrimental to true science, especially those on the frontier.
- vouaobrasil 2y ago> And how do you even guarantee this, 'accurate' and 'unbiased'? Any form of peer review will always have a slant, no matter how 'objective' it is intended to be. Peer review of peer review. Instead of a couple of scientists looking at it, the peer-review process should be entirely open. So other people can scrutinize it.