4 ms·
If I were fly I’d implement spending caps just to filter out unserious operators. My implementation of that feature would be when you turned it on fly would ju
by kasey_junk 2y ago
If I were fly I’d implement spending caps just to filter out unserious operators.
My implementation of that feature would be when you turned it on fly would just kick you off.
No serious operator wants a provider to turn their system off. So if you want that it’s pretty clear you are hosting a silly system. Which likely costs more to support and drives less margin.
- _jab 2y agoNo serious operator would choose a provider with your implementation of that feature.
- lo3p0ez 2y agoHu? For any business having a due to a cap throttled service is better than losing the money straight away due to an accidental cloud bill explosion.
- icedchai 2y agoThe real solution is to make it simpler to set up billing alerts. If my hobby project is ever projected to cost more than $0.50/hr, let me know. Billing alerts should be part of onboarding for all cloud providers, especially for individuals that don’t want surprises.
- langcss 2y agoAnd yet every single cloud let's you scale from zero and play and experiment. They know today's tinkerers are tomorrow's CTO decision makers.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]