4 ms·
I mean, the R5 IBIS mode was always a bit of a toy. No compensation for motion blur, no compensation for hand held, and even when it works it's still not super-
by groby_b 2y ago
I mean, the R5 IBIS mode was always a bit of a toy. No compensation for motion blur, no compensation for hand held, and even when it works it's still not super-resolution without artifacts.
But it's mostly "shoot with a tripod, nobody move", and if I'm in that situation, most of the time you're better of getting a smaller FOV and taking shots for panoramic stitching.
Is there a real pixel shift use case outside of "I want a picture of my 4K monitor"?
- vouaobrasil 2y agoI don't understand. IBIS is very useful for handheld photography and video. Works very well. Motion blur of the subject, obviously not.
- dannyw 2y agoParent is referring to IBIS High Resolution Shift, not normal IBIS.
- franga2000 2y ago> Is there a real pixel shift use case outside of "I want a picture of my 4K monitor"? Resolution matter for more than just filling the pixels on a big monitor. Many uses are more technical / less artsy, like digitizing film/prints/paintings/whatever, shooting through a microscope or telescope or, as the author mentions, avoiding artifacts by downscaling.
- lm28469 2y ago> Is there a real pixel shift use case outside of "I want a picture of my 4K monitor"? Anything that requires good color reproduction. Archiving for example (museums &c.)
- groby_b 2y agoHuh. I'm surprised you'd use an R5 in that situation, but I assume since it's a good chunk cheaper than an actual archival camera, it might make sense especially for smaller institutions. TIL, thanks for sharing!