3 ms·
I find this falls in the same category as ‘you agree to the terms and conditions even if nobody actually reads a 200 page document’. It’s not that I disagree t
by Aeolun 2y ago
I find this falls in the same category as ‘you agree to the terms and conditions even if nobody actually reads a 200 page document’.
It’s not that I disagree the law is nonsense, but the argument doesn’t make any sense in my opinion.
There is nothing preventing anyone from filling out that evaluation with exactly the same ‘It will not materially impact children’ every time, any more than it stops people from adding the same zero to all fields on their tax forms.
- burnerthrow008 2y agoAgain, you are being disingenuous. Whether it materially impacts children is not a fact but a judgment. The code is designed such that it is nearly impossible to say anything other than “it may impact children”. Websites are effectively forced to write a document that says “be believe that our site may negatively impact children”. Now, what are the odds that a future politically-motivated DA won’t “accidentally” leak that “secret document which admits they knew they were harming children” when they want to go after someone for something unrelated?