3 ms·

http://www.microsoft.com/global/surface/en/us/renderingassets/surfacespecsheet.pdf http://www.microsoft.com/global/surface/en/us/renderingasset... WinRT (ARM)

http://www.microsoft.com/global/surface/en/us/renderingassets/surfacespecsheet.pdf http://www.microsoft.com/global/surface/en/us/renderingasset... WinRT (ARM) and a Intel version. Multitouch keyboard. Full HD on the Intel tablet on 10.6 inch screen (nearly the same density as the MBP Retina) Also, funny the comments here, the iPad edges are tapered, but the RT version is 9.3mm and Apple says the iPad is 9.4mm deep. Why oh why are they pushing Silverlight to show the video?

CamperBob2 14y ago
Why oh why are they pushing Silverlight to show the video? It's as if they decided to rip off both Apple's and Sony's philophies in one presentation.
MBCook 14y ago
WinRT (ARM) and a Intel version The dual CPU thing still worries me. I think it's going to cause a ton confusion for consumers when Windows 8 comes out. These two tablets look the same, they're named the same, they use the same accessories. One will cost more than the other. They look like a 13" MacBook Air vs 13" MacBook Pro. But it won't be, because they run completely different OSes. The ARM one won't run your old software. It won't run the windows desktop you're used to. Some big game comes out? I wonder if it will run on WinRT. Since all the devices will have lower specs, will AAA titles be available? You could buy the more expensive one. I bet it has lower battery life. It won't come with Office, so not only do you have to pay $200 more for the device (random guess), but you also have to pay $100-$500 for a copy of Office on top just to match what's on the ARM tablet. The tablets are clearly quite different. They should be positioned differently, they should look physically different. I really want to see how consumers take to Intel vs. ARM. I can't help but think it's going to be a disaster. As for these tablets? The cover looks great, and MS does know how to make hardware (I've loved my Natural keyboards since '95 or '96). It's great to know there will be one device on the market that (should be) well made and not crazily under-specced for cost reasons. But does all this make third parties very nervous. Are these "demo" units to start the market, or the first wave of MS competing directly?
- freehunter 14y ago
  Microsoft said on their technet blog that their ARM devices will be clearly labeled and marketed as not being able to run traditional Windows software.

CamperBob2 14y ago

Why oh why are they pushing Silverlight to show the video? It's as if they decided to rip off both Apple's and Sony's philophies in one presentation.

MBCook 14y ago

WinRT (ARM) and a Intel version The dual CPU thing still worries me. I think it's going to cause a ton confusion for consumers when Windows 8 comes out. These two tablets look the same, they're named the same, they use the same accessories. One will cost more than the other. They look like a 13" MacBook Air vs 13" MacBook Pro. But it won't be, because they run completely different OSes. The ARM one won't run your old software. It won't run the windows desktop you're used to. Some big game comes out? I wonder if it will run on WinRT. Since all the devices will have lower specs, will AAA titles be available? You could buy the more expensive one. I bet it has lower battery life. It won't come with Office, so not only do you have to pay $200 more for the device (random guess), but you also have to pay $100-$500 for a copy of Office on top just to match what's on the ARM tablet. The tablets are clearly quite different. They should be positioned differently, they should look physically different. I really want to see how consumers take to Intel vs. ARM. I can't help but think it's going to be a disaster. As for these tablets? The cover looks great, and MS does know how to make hardware (I've loved my Natural keyboards since '95 or '96). It's great to know there will be one device on the market that (should be) well made and not crazily under-specced for cost reasons. But does all this make third parties very nervous. Are these "demo" units to start the market, or the first wave of MS competing directly?

freehunter 14y ago
Microsoft said on their technet blog that their ARM devices will be clearly labeled and marketed as not being able to run traditional Windows software.