10 ms·
I couldn’t possibly disagree with every point in this post any more. Rust is bad because.. people update things? What?
by jmartin2683 2y ago
I couldn’t possibly disagree with every point in this post any more. Rust is bad because.. people update things? What?
- abenga 2y agoI get why it might not matter depending on the work you do, but if non-trivial work is required just to keep your code building due to fast non-backward compatible changes in libraries you use, that might introduce hesitation.
- roland35 2y agoIsn't that the point of semantic versions though? You can lock it if you need to.