3 ms·
That's fine (and already common) for images, JSON, etc. But nobody wants webpage URL's that randomly end in .php, .htm, .html, .aspx, and so forth. That's just
by crazygringo 2y ago
That's fine (and already common) for images, JSON, etc.
But nobody wants webpage URL's that randomly end in .php, .htm, .html, .aspx, and so forth. That's just noise that is both gibberish and entirely irrelevant to the user.
- codetrotter 2y ago.htm and .html is relevant just like .pdf and .zip etc etc But I agree about .php, .aspx and other extensions that are telling something about the server side. That’s irrelevant for the user.
- shawabawa3 2y ago> .htm and .html is relevant just like .pdf and .zip etc etc it's _kind of_ relevant, if it weren't for the fact that the absence of any extension implies .html >99% of the time