Disappointed with the article. I was expecting a bit more depth since the title claimed "after 6 months". Especially because the article claims - The Apple Vis

Disappointed with the article. I was expecting a bit more depth since the title claimed "after 6 months". Especially because the article claims - The Apple Vision Pro debuted six months ago. I was hesitant to provide any detailed thoughts on the device and its implications until I (and others) had a few months to use it. Here are my eight takeaways on the Apple Vision Pro after six months. Takeaway #1: Apple Did Not (and Does Not) Want to Manage Expectations for the Vision Pro -- Talks about keynote and marketing quotes from the day of the launch -- Revolutionary company believes their product is revolutionary. Takeaway #2: The Vision Pro Probably Cost Tens of Billions to Develop -- Company spent truckload of money making a new product Takeaway #3: The Vision Pro Is Not Really From The Future -- Talks about what Zuckerberg thinks. This isnt really a "takeaway", nor a "personal experience" Takeaway #4: EyeSight is An Expensive Feature —and Not Worth It -- First true experience, and interesting to read Takeaway #5: The Vision Pro is, Today, Mostly a VR device (Even Though Apple Claims Otherwise) -- Good. VR headset is being used as a VR headset. Takeaway #6: The Benefits of Using a Vision Pro Fall Significantly Short of its Drawbacks -- The product isnt as revolutionary as we thought folks. Takeaway #7: Developer Adoption Remains a Problem -- Not really a personal experience, but an observation. Takeaway #8: Apple has Promptly Reshaped Terminology, Customer Perceptions, and Competitor Plans -- Has it though? So many words to say Vision Pro is a disappointing mess. Of the 8 takeaways, only 2 takeaways were made based on experience. Others were either fluff, or repeating news articles or mere observations.