3 ms·
Here [0] is the paper in question, it has a chart that shows the reflection rate of this one at around 0.3 - 2%; the paper itself has the following quote for th
by Cthulhu_ 2y ago
Here [0] is the paper in question, it has a chart that shows the reflection rate of this one at around 0.3 - 2%; the paper itself has the following quote for the competitors:
> Far lower reflectance values have been achieved with materials containing aligned carbon nanotubes (CNT), for example a low-density CNT array (0.045%),[11] the coating Vantablack (0.035%)[7] and a CNT-metal foil (0.005%).[12] The current holder of the “record” for a low reflectivity material (<0.0002%) is an ion-track micro-textured polymer with anti-backscatter matrix.[13]
So they're arguing that it's on-par with Vantablack but not the newer materials.
[0] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.202400184 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/adsu.202400184
- shibbidybop 2y agoFrom your numbers Vantablack is 0.035%, whereas the new process bottoms out at 0.3%. So they’re within 10x of Vantablack, but not on the same level.