4 ms·
Well, I don't want it to get to a point where it is already a solved problem. Length of life should not be the criterion; quality of life should be. If every o
by sriram_malhar 2y ago
Well, I don't want it to get to a point where it is already a solved problem.
Length of life should not be the criterion; quality of life should be. If every one lives to be 200, then the quality of life will necessarily reduce for everyone; we are already straining the planet's resources, even if we don't make strides in keeping everyone fit and independent until they die.
- skeaker 2y agoThis hinges on the idea that death is preferable to a lowering of your current quality of life, which is very much not something that people are going to agree on.