3 ms·

I don't know the outcome of the second one you mentioned, but Glyphosate use was extended last year for another 10 years [0]. So what is the "actual impact" you

• RandomThoughts3 2y ago
  > I don't know the outcome of the second one you mentioned, There is a whole paragraph about the outcome in the page you literally linked. It leads to this report [1] where the commission basically dismisses the ECI and explains they will do nothing but at least the commission had to make its position clear and replies. [1] https://food.ec.europa.eu/document/download/09b68864-8425-4f93-a935-b8b20d791ddc_en?filename=pesticides_glyphosate_eci_final.pdf https://food.ec.europa.eu/document/download/09b68864-8425-4f...
• niemandhier 2y ago
  The proposal had 2 clauses, the second reads: ” ensure that the scientific evaluation of pesticides for EU regulatory approval is based only on published studies, which are commissioned by competent public authorities instead of the pesticide industry”. The second part was addressed by a proposal, that was accepted. It’s in the bottom of the pages here: https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/2017/000002/ban-glyphosate-and-protect-people-and-environment-toxic-pesticides_en https://citizens-initiative.europa.eu/initiatives/details/20...