3 ms·
My point is that a small bump in voter turnout is not worth sacrificing the integrity of the voting scheme. That point applies just as well with a 50% turnout a
by baobabKoodaa 2y ago
My point is that a small bump in voter turnout is not worth sacrificing the integrity of the voting scheme. That point applies just as well with a 50% turnout as it does with a 30% turnout. For example, a bump from 30% to 35% is largely irrelevant.
If everyone can conveniently vote and then no-one's votes are counted because Putin makes up tally numbers, that sucks.