3 ms·

I really can't wait for this technology to improve. Unfortunately just from testing this it seems not very useful. It takes more work to modify the bad model it

I really can't wait for this technology to improve. Unfortunately just from testing this it seems not very useful. It takes more work to modify the bad model it approximates from the image output than starting with a good foundation from scratch. I would rather see something that took a series of steps to reach a higher quality end product more slowly instead of expecting everything to come from one image. Perhaps i'm missing the use case?

MrTrvp 2y ago
Perhaps it'll require a series of segmentation and transforms that improves individual components and then works up towards the full 3d model of the image.
andybak 2y ago
> not very useful Useful for what? I think use cases will emerge. A lot of critiques assume you're working in VFX or game development. Making image to 3d (and by extension text to image to 3d) effortless a whole host of new applications open up - which might not be anywhere near so demanding.