3 ms·
Except that obese people are a massive cost to society, whilst children are the only means for continuation of human life, and thus of society, and so are supre
by pbhjpbhj 2y ago
Except that obese people are a massive cost to society, whilst children are the only means for continuation of human life, and thus of society, and so are supremely vital to it.
There's no additional cost in seating children, or those incapable of self-supervision, with their parent/carer. The low cost airlines force the separation in order to make an inconvenience that they hope to charge for. Like if they wiped your hands with grease as you got in the aeroplane and then charged for hand wipes.
- elmerfud 2y agoThere is an additional cost for that seating especially when the airline has already sold seats and there's no two seats placed together. Most of this is a convenience fee if you know where you want to sit it's worth it to you to pay a little bit extra. So for you to say there's no additional cost is not true especially when the requirement is you must require that the person can cancel or rebook to other flights if those two specific seats you want aren't available. There is definitely a cost to the implementation of this plan. It is literally asking other customers to pay for one person's convenience.
- ryandrake 2y agoWhen a restaurant gives you a plate with your food, the plate is an additional cost for the restaurant. Would you consider a plate to be "an additional feature?" Hey, some people might prefer to get $1 off their bill and eat without a plate. Why not charge everyone else a $1 Plate Fee? As a non-plate eater, I resent having to pay that $1 and get a plate I don't need.