3 ms·
That's not a good assumption, and even the original example is Bool + Bool; len(Bool ∪ Bool) = 2 * len(Bool) is trivially false. About the Cartesian product, t
by marcosdumay 2y ago
That's not a good assumption, and even the original example is Bool + Bool; len(Bool ∪ Bool) = 2 * len(Bool) is trivially false.
About the Cartesian product, the tags create that rule. Untagged multiplication again has fewer elements.