4 ms·

Because there is absolutely zero evidence that there are drugs being physically trafficked at Meta's offices? What should happen is that a court should be able

by RIMR 2y ago

Because there is absolutely zero evidence that there are drugs being physically trafficked at Meta's offices? What should happen is that a court should be able to drag responsible executives in front of a judge, issue massive fines for what has already happened, and order that Meta stop running ads until they can present an agreeable plan to prevent these kinds of ads from running. Then they should be under a consent degree, and subject to regular government inspection, and if the agreed upon mitigation plan isn't being followed and these kinds of ads are running again, the same executives should be dragged back in front of court, Meta should be prohibited from running ads for months as a punishment, and to force them back to the drawing board to fix the issue permanently, and the responsible executives should be given significant personal fines, and a short jail sentence for violating court orders. Rinse and repeat until either Meta is permanently barred from running ads, putting them out of business, and/or the responsible executives (including the CEO if applicable) have enough strikes that they get a decade or so in prison to make an example of what happens when you refuse to operate a business within the law and kill people with black market drugs.

freejazz 2y ago
>Because there is absolutely zero evidence that there are drugs being physically trafficked at Meta's offices? Well that's not why they would raid Meta. They would raid them to preserve evidence and documents of Meta's complicity with the drug trafficking that does occur on their platforms.
- RIMR 2y ago
  They can do that with a court order. Meta would end up caught with their pants down if they deleted evidence. There's little to no chance that they could do that without either leaving behind damning evidence, or having an employee blow the whistle.
  - freejazz 2y ago
    Yes, they can do that with a court order. Was that in question? As to whether or not they could get away with it, I don't agree. Depends what you mean by get away with it. They'd probably rather take a default on the issue than release any internal discussions making them look complicit.

by RIMR 2y ago

freejazz 2y ago

>Because there is absolutely zero evidence that there are drugs being physically trafficked at Meta's offices? Well that's not why they would raid Meta. They would raid them to preserve evidence and documents of Meta's complicity with the drug trafficking that does occur on their platforms.

RIMR 2y ago
They can do that with a court order. Meta would end up caught with their pants down if they deleted evidence. There's little to no chance that they could do that without either leaving behind damning evidence, or having an employee blow the whistle.
- freejazz 2y ago
  Yes, they can do that with a court order. Was that in question? As to whether or not they could get away with it, I don't agree. Depends what you mean by get away with it. They'd probably rather take a default on the issue than release any internal discussions making them look complicit.