3 ms·
The headline is a bit misleading compared to the article. Everybody already cares about dignity but only at the expense of everyone else. We need to prioritize
by vehemenz 2y ago
The headline is a bit misleading compared to the article. Everybody already cares about dignity but only at the expense of everyone else. We need to prioritize dignity for pedestrians at the expense of drivers.
Everyone in Yukons and F150s are already using, at least in their minds, what they think is a dignified mode of transportation. Excluding cities for the wealthy (there's no dignity for the poor anyway), most cities in the US are not livable without a car. Affording a car, particularly a new one, earns one some degree of dignity. Furthermore, drivers living in poorly planned-cities spend lots of time in their cars and have chosen larger cars where they feel comfortable and safe.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mbs159 2y ago> chosen larger cars where they feel comfortable and safe. Larger cars do have a higher chance of roll-over and are much more dangerous to pedestrians (especially children due to a enormous blind spot near the front of the car) and drivers in smaller cars. Driving what is essentially a consumer tank and calling it comfortable and safe is a dangerous line of thinking, and the casualty numbers show it.