5 ms·
This headline is kind of misleading. It's actually someone's personal (educated) opinion on a blog, not a statement of fact. Should be something more like "I th
by itunpredictable 2y ago
This headline is kind of misleading. It's actually someone's personal (educated) opinion on a blog, not a statement of fact. Should be something more like "I think CrowdStrike will be liable" or "CrowdStrike should be liable"
- 627467 2y agothe full headline (at this time at least) is more nuanced than seen here in hn: CrowdStrike will be liable for damages in France, based on the OVH precedent.
- crtasm 2y agoIt's also in the URL. Submitter, please don't remove important parts of headlines.
- jncfhnb 2y agoDoesn’t really make it any less misleading. It is still just an opinion.
- fennecbutt 2y agoNo, because the current title can be misinterpreted as a statement of fact. And you know that.