That's not entirely true. `z.string()` in Zod offers more than just type safety akin to TypeScript. TypeScript provides compile-time type checking, while Zod ad

That's not entirely true. `z.string()` in Zod offers more than just type safety akin to TypeScript. TypeScript provides compile-time type checking, while Zod adds runtime validation and parsing. For those unfamiliar: `z.string()` effectively converts `mySchema` into a functional schema capable of parsing and validation. For example: `mySchema.parse("some data")` returns successfully. `mySchema.parse(321)` throws an exception. I've used it in places where you need runtime validation and in process verification - it works pretty well for that and you can extract the types from it via : const A = z.string(); type A = z.infer<typeof A>; // string Meaning if you define your types in zod first, and infer their types from that you get compile and runtime type checking. --- It a bit of an overkill for nimble and fast code bases though - but works wonders for situations where in process proofing needs to be done, and in all honesty it isn't that big of a task to do this.