3 ms·
Reminds of Varoufakis proposal which is way more radical tl;dr: —————— To imagine what transcending capitalism might mean in practice requires rethinking the
by atmosx 2y ago
Reminds of Varoufakis proposal which is way more radical tl;dr:
——————
To imagine what transcending capitalism might mean in practice requires rethinking the ownership of corporations.
Imagine that shares resemble electoral votes, which can be neither bought nor sold. Like students who receive a library card upon registration, new staff receive a single share granting a single vote to be cast in all-shareholder ballots deciding every matter of the corporation — from management and planning issues to the distribution of net revenues and bonuses.
Suddenly, the profit-wage distinction makes no sense and corporations are cut down to size, so boosting market competition. When a baby is born, the central bank automatically grants them a trust fund (or personal capital account) that is periodically topped up with a universal basic dividend. When the child becomes a teenager, the central bank throws in a free checking account.
Workers move freely from company to company, carrying with them their trust-fund capital, which they may lend to the company they work in or to others.
Because there are no equities to turbocharge with massive fictitious capital, finance becomes delightfully boring — and stable. States drop all personal and sales taxes, instead taxing only corporate revenues, land, and activities detrimental to the commons.
—————
Excerpt from https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-30972828.html https://www.irishexaminer.com/opinion/commentanalysis/arid-3...
- eru 2y ago> To imagine what transcending capitalism might mean in practice requires rethinking the ownership of corporations. > Imagine that shares resemble electoral votes, which can be neither bought nor sold. Interesting idea. Perhaps the take-away is that we should allow trading in electoral votes.
- Nasrudith 2y agoI thought the main reason we didn't allow for vote buying directly (advertising is doing the same thing but less reloably) was because it encouraged "corporate raiders" too much, one for whom a sufficient amount of capital would be encouraged to leave a mess by stripping out the copper wiring and selling it for a profit. Combined with the other issues of non-secret ballots like (political) bosses extorting votes.
- eru 2y agoHuh, I don't understand the reference to copper wiring?