I definitely do not understand the internal structure, process, and politics of Wikimedia (either the community or foundation). But my feeling as a long time us

I definitely do not understand the internal structure, process, and politics of Wikimedia (either the community or foundation). But my feeling as a long time user and donor is that Wikipedia should remain a neutral and apolitical resource if it is to be the world’s encyclopedia. However, I’ve noticed a disturbing trend over the years with Wikipedia’s English content becoming more skewed. Various articles have significant biases, mostly leaning towards the American political left, and you can see how the edits and discussions in talk pages got things to that point. Wikipedia seems to be heavily influenced and controlled by a small set of highly active and powerful users who seem to treat control of Wikipedia as a personal mission. I see shades of that even here in this movement charter. For example, in https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter#Responsibilities_3 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Movement_Charter#Responsibil... it looks like the Movement Charter proposes responsibilities like this which seem very politically biased: > facilitating inclusion, equity, and diversity within their community; It also seems like it is biased towards highly active and engaged users - from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2024-07-22/News_and_notes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2...: > "'The quorum' is only 2% (!) of the eligible voters, and who know how many of them are the affiliates members"