4 ms·
>You're acting as if commoditizing one's complements is either new or reprehensible [1]. I'm acting as if calling on other companies to open source their core
by tw04 2y ago
>You're acting as if commoditizing one's complements is either new or reprehensible [1].
I'm acting as if calling on other companies to open source their core product, just because it's a complement for you, and acting as if it's for the benefit of mankind is disingenuous, which it is.
- stale2002 2y ago> as if it's for the benefit of mankind But it does benefit mankind. More free tech products is good for the world. This is a good thing. When people or companies do good things, they should get the credit for doing good things.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> acting as if it's for the benefit of mankind is disingenuous, which it is Is it bad for mankind that Meta publishes its weights? Mutually beneficial is a valid game state--there is no moral law that requires anything good be made as a sacrifice.