> This is just the same as that. You are making another baseless assumption. > Example of legal way to manipulate research: Stop anything you don't like from

> This is just the same as that. You are making another baseless assumption. > Example of legal way to manipulate research: Stop anything you don't like from getting published. What I think you are implying, is that it won't be popularized enough, soon enough, to serve some interest. I only think this because, well...how would you stop someone from posting the original on torrent? Your concern has nothing to do with the science, per se, but how it's perceived. What if it passed through with 0 manipulation? The inverse thinking is being casually dismissed, which is bad faith. Good luck with that.