3 ms·

> Its not, wanting to review before publication is done to manipulate the research, This is not fact. There are multiple possibilities that do not include mani

• Jensson 2y ago
  > If there was manipulation, there would be a recourse to pursue for fraud. Its legal to manipulate research except some extreme levels of manipulation. Legal manipulation is still manipulation, there is a reason companies pays so much to publish their own science, its so they can manipulate it. This is just the same as that. Example of legal way to manipulate research: Stop anything you don't like from getting published. There is nothing illegal about that but that can massively hurt science.
  • Supermancho 2y ago
    > This is just the same as that. You are making another baseless assumption. > Example of legal way to manipulate research: Stop anything you don't like from getting published. What I think you are implying, is that it won't be popularized enough, soon enough, to serve some interest. I only think this because, well...how would you stop someone from posting the original on torrent? Your concern has nothing to do with the science, per se, but how it's perceived. What if it passed through with 0 manipulation? The inverse thinking is being casually dismissed, which is bad faith. Good luck with that.