4 ms·
I don't think the parent comment was ignoring that. The penalty for a company who does this can't be to bring someone back from the dead, it's likely to be fina
by frereubu 2y ago
I don't think the parent comment was ignoring that. The penalty for a company who does this can't be to bring someone back from the dead, it's likely to be financial, which is the aspect they're talking about.
- maeil 2y ago[flagged]
- kadoban 2y agoGood. That's the HN way.
- stavros 2y agoThat's how I read it, ie "will there be severe fines for the loss of life and other losses for this?".
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- SirGiggles 2y agoAs others have already stated, yes, that is how we should be interpreting comments, in good faith and in the most charitable way as the site guidelines suggests us to.
- cqqxo4zV46cp 2y agoYou’re basically asking for a virtue signalling disclaimer. I think you’d prefer a different social network.
- Clubber 2y agoI've finally learned to spot and ignore all emotional arguments. https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/appeal-to-emotion https://www.scribbr.com/fallacies/appeal-to-emotion
- covercash 2y agoIf this was a Japanese company, the entire c-suite would have committed seppuku by now.