4 ms·
Their announcement (see Reddit for example) says it was a “content deployment” issue which could suggest it’s the AV definitions/whatever rather than the driver
by tomduncalf 2y ago
Their announcement (see Reddit for example) says it was a “content deployment” issue which could suggest it’s the AV definitions/whatever rather than the driver itself… so even if you had gradual rollout for drivers, it might not help!
- dboreham 2y agoIt's definitely the driver itself if it blue screens the kernel. Quite possibility data-sensitive of course.
- rplnt 2y agoIt might have been a long-present bug in the driver, yes, but today's failure was apparently caused by content/data update.
- easytiger 2y agoIn most appreciations of risk around upgrades in environments with which i am familiar, changing config/static data etc counts as a systemic update and is controlled in the same way
- baq 2y agohttps://x.com/brody_n77/status/1814185935476863321 https://x.com/brody_n77/status/1814185935476863321 [0] The driver can't gracefully handle invalid content - so you're kinda both right. [0] brody_n77 is: Director of OverWatch, CrowdStrike Inc.
- piyh 2y agoLooks like a great way to bypass crowd strike if I'm an adversary nation state
- jrochkind1 2y agoI came to HN hoping to find more technical info on the issue, and with hundreds of comments yours is the first I found with something of interest, so thanks! Too bad there's no way to upvote it to the top.
- everybodyknows 2y agoAnyone copy the original text? Now getting: > Hmm...this page doesn’t exist. Try searching for something else
- baq 2y agoI don’t have the exact copy, but it said it was a ‘channel file’ which was broken.