4 ms·
Anyone keeping count on which cycle of “I’m switching to Git{Hub|Lab}” this puts us?
by lijok 2y ago
Anyone keeping count on which cycle of “I’m switching to Git{Hub|Lab}” this puts us?
- edvards 2y agoTime for Gitea.
- Macha 2y agoHonestly, Gitea have started on the open core route, I'm skipping over them and have gone to Forgejo
- nicce 2y agoYeah, Gitea is now owned by for-profit company, decided without any communication with the community. Forgejo is the non-profit fork. See: https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/ https://forgejo.org/compare-to-gitea/
- 0x00cl 2y agoI thought Codeberg (Forgejo, fork of gitea) was the new flavour.
- janice1999 2y agoDon't forget the forks: Gog -> Gitea -> Forejo
- ibz 2y agoOr just forget all of that and go to Fossil? SQLite seems the least likely to pull the rug.
- _flux 2y agoRadicle! It's the easiest (?) way for anyone to "self host" a repo with issue tracker. But there's of course the chance that the team developing it will be sold, even if the actual app is open source.
- gsaslis 2y agoProbably not the "easiest", and it's not really production-ready yet, *but* it is the one open source solution for hosting open source software that will never be affected by the "Explores Sale" problem - the same way that BitTorrents have never had that problem: it is a fully decentralized, peer-to-peer network for hosting source code.