3 ms·
Product people will not. So we have the inglorious situation of 2 sets of diagrams and notes on the translation between them. If the problem was easy to solve,
by Supermancho 2y ago
Product people will not. So we have the inglorious situation of 2 sets of diagrams and notes on the translation between them. If the problem was easy to solve, it wouldn't be something you can express in a sentence, while simultaneously asserting how easy it is.
Some people do not adequately constrain the problem while others overly constrain it, conceptually.
- canterburry 2y agoBPMN was created for product people. UML use case diagrams were created for product people. I don't see the argument why product people don't need to learn this. They work in a software organization, they build software, they should be expected to know the diagrams pertinent to them.
- malfist 2y agoUse Case Diagrams are only one small part of UML, usually the part people learn, but it's way bigger than that.
- steve1977 2y agoAnd the infamous stick figure diagrams are even only a small part of Use Case analysis and design themselves within UML.
- pessimizer 2y ago> I don't see the argument why product people don't need to learn this. They need to, but in my experience, they simply don't want to. They want to get the credit for the product, but they want to wave their arm and just have its features appear without actually specifying them. I understand because it is hard, exacting work. But as it is specificity just gets pushed from product people down to the lowest-level person responsible for implementation.