4 ms·
AMD's definition of "support" I think is different than what people expect, and pretty misleading - ROCm itself will run on almost anything, back as far as the
by mappu 2y ago
AMD's definition of "support" I think is different than what people expect, and pretty misleading - ROCm itself will run on almost anything, back as far as the RX 400/500 series:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROCm#:~:text=GCN%205%20%2D%20Vega).-,Consumer%2Dgrade%20GPUs,-%5Bedit%5D https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROCm#:~:text=GCN%205%20%2D%20V...
Stable Diffusion ran fine for me on RX 570 and RX 6600XT with nothing but distro packages.
- imtringued 2y agoI don't buy it. Even running things like llama.cpp on my RX 570 via Vulkan crashes the entire system.
- Nab443 2y agoThe last time I checked, I was stuck with a pretty old kernel if I wanted to have the last version of ROCm available for my rx470. It's compatible at some point in time, but not kept compatible with recent kernels.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- mappu 2y agoIt's the responsibility of your distro to ship things that work together,
- slavik81 2y agoThere are out-of-bounds writes in the BLAS libraries for gfx803 GPUs (such as the RX 570). That hardware might work fine for your use case, but there's a lot of failures in the test suites. I agree that the official support list is very conservative, but I wouldn't recommend pre-Vega GPUs for use with ROCm. Stick to gfx900 and newer, if you can.