4 ms·
Yes it really would be. It's the reason I use Linux in the first place, to have freedom to do whatever I want. I don't need linux to protect me from Windows Rec
by vrighter 2y ago
Yes it really would be. It's the reason I use Linux in the first place, to have freedom to do whatever I want. I don't need linux to protect me from Windows Recall. I chose linux because it already doesn't have stuff like that. And the system (used to) treat me like an adult.
- logicprog 2y agoYeah a secure-by-default system "doesn't treat you like an adult."
- vrighter 2y agoit's where the security boundary is. The system should protect me from unwanted software getting on the system. Once a piece of software starts running, I do want to give it full access to the system. If not, I'll run it in a container. All the protections wayland offers are to protect against a piece of software someone had to already have access to install. If you are that paranoid, set up selinux properly. Which nobody does, cos it's a pita. Enforcing permissions for everything on everyone is a similar pain in the ass.