3 ms·
To fulfill the requirements for civil libel claims you need to point to a specific harm. I suspect it would be difficult to prove no one wants to hire you and t
by sodality2 2y ago
To fulfill the requirements for civil libel claims you need to point to a specific harm. I suspect it would be difficult to prove no one wants to hire you and that they all decided that on the basis of said libel
- Dylan16807 2y agoWhy would you need to prove "all"? If it's anywhere near that widespread it should be easy to demonstrate a ton of people not hiring based on false evidence. And it's hard to argue it wasn't malicious or negligent if it's that widespread.
- sodality2 2y agoTracking down >1 people who all rejected you and proving they all rejected you because of a video is strictly more difficult than tracking down 1. In addition, a video being popular doesn’t have anything to do with the intent of the person who posted it. I’m not an expert though. I only mean to say it would be difficult to prove, just like all libel cases are. I don’t think there’s anything inherent to a deepfake case that would make it an easy slam dunk for civil libel. I could be wrong though
- Dylan16807 2y ago> Tracking down >1 people who all rejected you and proving they all rejected you because of a video is strictly more difficult than tracking down 1. If it affected millions of people or more then it's really easy to find examples. > In addition, a video being popular doesn’t have anything to do with the intent of the person who posted it. The impersonation already says a lot.