3 ms·
> abuse perfectly legal free speech. people dont remember that the free speech clause only applies to the gov't, not to private entities. You dont get to claim
by chii 2y ago
> abuse perfectly legal free speech.
people dont remember that the free speech clause only applies to the gov't, not to private entities. You dont get to claim free speech in a Wendy's.
- willcipriano 2y ago> Newly released documents show that the White House has played a major role in censoring Americans on social media. Email exchanges between Rob Flaherty, the White House’s director of digital media, and social-media executives prove the companies put Covid censorship policies in place in response to relentless, coercive pressure from the White House —not voluntarily. The emails emerged Jan. 6 in the discovery phase of Missouri v. Biden, a free-speech case brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana.... https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115561/documents/HHRG-118-IF16-20230328-SD017.pdf https://www.congress.gov/118/meeting/house/115561/documents/...
- ok123456 2y agoExactly. There's open collusion between the DHS, other government organs, and these major platforms. The veil has been pierced. There is no difference between either YouTube or the US government directly censoring you.
- ok123456 2y agoWe have enough problems with gratuitous DMCA notices, and there are enough bad-faith actors willing to abuse this reporting system. Whether or not the actual content is AI-generated and defamatory is secondary.