> The linked opinion makes a point of explaining how this case differs frim Wickard v Filburn. My take is that the district court has to show deference to Wick

> The linked opinion makes a point of explaining how this case differs frim Wickard v Filburn. My take is that the district court has to show deference to Wickard... but that doesn't mean that the whole issue can't be teed up to become a challenge to Wickard on appeal. > For as crazy as the 5th circur and Supreme Court are, I don't see either of them being crazy enough to take on Wickard v Filburn. They're pretty gosh-darned crazy is all I'm saying here.