3 ms·

>It's misleading because twitter calls it a verification, if they didn't, it wouldn't be misleading. I'm also talking about the check mark as well but yes, the

• freejazz 2y ago
  >And not only those two items (check mark, the word "verification") but as mentioned elsewhere apparently the check mark actually did mean something more. Twitter purports it means verified. That's why they might be fined. It's still not clear to me how this is a difficult concept for you to grasp that you keep talking about what it meant elsewhere as opposed to on twitter. On twitter's website, right now it calls them a verification. That's why its misleading. If they called it a proof of sale, or whatever you keep insisting it "really" means, it wouldn't be misleading. But they don't call it that! >When you call my posts "stupid" and me "obtuse", its honestly an invitation to conclude this little conversation as you now have the advantage in the debate, you get to call names and I'd rather not. Calling this a conversation is generous. You just assert your own point without any regard to the meaning of anything else actually said. That's why its obtuse. It's stupid because it's facially wrong.
  • cowboylowrez 2y ago
    >Calling this a conversation is generous. this I'll agree with, have a good one.