4 ms·
The complaint in the article is legit, and it sounds completely plausible that is it due to re-write to React, as avoiding rendering of off-screen content is fa
by codingdave 2y ago
The complaint in the article is legit, and it sounds completely plausible that is it due to re-write to React, as avoiding rendering of off-screen content is fairly standard practice in React, as a performance optimization.
But that really is about the management of the re-write, not the tech. Someone at github decided to not render off-screen content. That breaks expectations compared to how it worked before, and that is why it feels like the app is going downhill.
The bigger point being that if anyone is doing a re-write, and trying to match the existing UX... that needs to be a deeper match than just getting the pixels in the right place.
- marcosdumay 2y agoIt's due to the people responsible for the tech having no idea how people want to use the tech. What means you can expect it continuing downhill until somebody higher up acts.
- xigoi 2y ago> avoiding rendering of off-screen content is fairly standard practice in React, as a performance optimization. Not using React would be a much bigger performance optimization.