4 ms·

The relationship is key. I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea. Situations changed and I need someone else for the po

The relationship is key. I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea. Situations changed and I need someone else for the position. I have so much guilt and I must do something for this worker.

ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
You can't change the reasons for which you need a new person, and you've materially benefited from the person working for low pay. But it's not guilt, it's your morality and ethics identifying a gain you made that you feel you shouldn't be comfortable with. One suggestion, perhaps the most obvious: identify the likely pay/compensation of the person who will replace them, and then pay them the difference (or as much of it as you can) in severance over and above what you're required to offer. Second suggestion: help find this person a new job at the kind of pay they should actually have been earning for the quality of work they were doing. But don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation. It's a good thing, not a negative emotion. It means you're thinking like a complete person in a world where it is common to pretend that isn't necessary.
- jrs235 2y ago
  >it's your morality and ethics identifying a gain you made that you feel you shouldn't be comfortable with. What's your definition of guilt then? Just curious. Thanks.
  - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
    My internal definition of guilt is screwed up because I have OCD. This is why I am so keen on defining guilt carefully. What I am describing above is just discomfort. Unless the parent poster deliberately sought to underpay the person, they should have no guilt merely from that scenario. Discomfort is real enough. Guilt might attach if they do not or choose not to act on that discomfort, or if the person is materially disadvantaged by not doing the ongoing work, or if a promise of better pay/longer employment was attached to asking for that work to be done at a low pay.
    - jrs235 2y ago
      Thank you.
- dasil003 2y ago
  > But don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation. It's a good thing, not a negative emotion. It means you're thinking like a complete person in a world where it is common to pretend that isn't necessary. If you have a moral obligation you can’t fulfill because of the rules of the human system you operate in, how exactly do you propose avoiding a negative emotion?
  - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
    Not sure I should answer a post with a "how exactly" in it, to be honest, because it's rude. But: I don't, but that negative emotion shouldn't necessarily be guilt. First off, we don't know the obligation can't be fulfilled in this case. No reason to feel guilty if it can be. Things change. Second, if there is genuinely nothing you can do to fulfil a moral obligation because of systemic issues, there is no value in guilt; it's literally not your fault. There might be negative emotions but it's better to consider them sadness or helplessness, and push away guilt. Negative emotions happen. But taking on guilt for things you did not do and cannot fix for reasons outside your control is significantly emotionally damaging.
    - dasil003 2y ago
      Apologies for the rude tone. I was mis-reading your comment as saying it's possible to fully avoid negative emotions around this type of situation, but going back I see that wasn't what you said. Yes, I agree with everything you've written here. The only nuance I'd add is that feeling guilt (or sadness, or helplessness) is not necessarily bad—emotions are valuable signals that can be mined for insight. I think the problem comes when we start to dwell on negative emotions and then internalize them as somehow representative of the state of the universe. Don't try to suppress or change the emotion, feel it, acknowledge it, then take a breath and decide on a course of action that you think will lead to the best outcome.
      - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
        Actually it is me who should apologise; I'm in an awful mood today and on other days would not have been so pompous, I hope :-) And yes -- I think to some extent my determination to push myself not to accept guilt for things that aren't my fault comes from realising that guilt for imagined misdeeds is the most potent fuel for OCD, which has wrecked the pattern of my life; it is a thief of joy. When I explained one of my OCD obsessions/compulsions to a friend, they said "I can understand why that affected you but you understand it is literally absurd to have guilt from that?", and it was one of the most empowering things I've ever heard. Guilt is a burden that good people willingly shoulder and bad people willingly shirk (if they are capable of it at all). Internalising that there are more productive negative emotions to feel than unearned, secondhand guilt is a life's work for me.
- rexpop 2y ago
  > don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation Let's not quibble. English is too imprecise for this kind of argument.
varispeed 2y ago
> I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea. Basically preying on someone's low self-esteem and impostor syndrome. It's a vile thing to do, but unfortunately businesses keep exploit workers this way. Did they believe in the idea to make shareholders buy themselves another yacht?
- ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
  This is a nasty accusation made without evidence.
  - shrimp_emoji 2y ago
    My favorite kind
  - varispeed 2y ago
    > I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea.
    - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
      Yes, that's the line you quoted earlier. It's still not evidence of your accusation and it won't become that through repetition.
      - fragmede 2y ago
        by your own admission you paid them low. What evidence is needed that you paid them low when that's what you're saying that yourself?
        ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
        It's not myself I am defending. That the developer has been paid low is a fact. The accusation is that they were paid low because they were exploitable due to their low self-esteem. This is projected onto this fact without evidence. Perhaps from bitter personal experience, but projected nevertheless.

ecjhdnc2025 2y ago

You can't change the reasons for which you need a new person, and you've materially benefited from the person working for low pay. But it's not guilt, it's your morality and ethics identifying a gain you made that you feel you shouldn't be comfortable with. One suggestion, perhaps the most obvious: identify the likely pay/compensation of the person who will replace them, and then pay them the difference (or as much of it as you can) in severance over and above what you're required to offer. Second suggestion: help find this person a new job at the kind of pay they should actually have been earning for the quality of work they were doing. But don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation. It's a good thing, not a negative emotion. It means you're thinking like a complete person in a world where it is common to pretend that isn't necessary.

jrs235 2y ago
>it's your morality and ethics identifying a gain you made that you feel you shouldn't be comfortable with. What's your definition of guilt then? Just curious. Thanks.
- ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
  My internal definition of guilt is screwed up because I have OCD. This is why I am so keen on defining guilt carefully. What I am describing above is just discomfort. Unless the parent poster deliberately sought to underpay the person, they should have no guilt merely from that scenario. Discomfort is real enough. Guilt might attach if they do not or choose not to act on that discomfort, or if the person is materially disadvantaged by not doing the ongoing work, or if a promise of better pay/longer employment was attached to asking for that work to be done at a low pay.
  - jrs235 2y ago
    Thank you.
dasil003 2y ago
> But don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation. It's a good thing, not a negative emotion. It means you're thinking like a complete person in a world where it is common to pretend that isn't necessary. If you have a moral obligation you can’t fulfill because of the rules of the human system you operate in, how exactly do you propose avoiding a negative emotion?
- ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
  Not sure I should answer a post with a "how exactly" in it, to be honest, because it's rude. But: I don't, but that negative emotion shouldn't necessarily be guilt. First off, we don't know the obligation can't be fulfilled in this case. No reason to feel guilty if it can be. Things change. Second, if there is genuinely nothing you can do to fulfil a moral obligation because of systemic issues, there is no value in guilt; it's literally not your fault. There might be negative emotions but it's better to consider them sadness or helplessness, and push away guilt. Negative emotions happen. But taking on guilt for things you did not do and cannot fix for reasons outside your control is significantly emotionally damaging.
  - dasil003 2y ago
    Apologies for the rude tone. I was mis-reading your comment as saying it's possible to fully avoid negative emotions around this type of situation, but going back I see that wasn't what you said. Yes, I agree with everything you've written here. The only nuance I'd add is that feeling guilt (or sadness, or helplessness) is not necessarily bad—emotions are valuable signals that can be mined for insight. I think the problem comes when we start to dwell on negative emotions and then internalize them as somehow representative of the state of the universe. Don't try to suppress or change the emotion, feel it, acknowledge it, then take a breath and decide on a course of action that you think will lead to the best outcome.
    - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
      Actually it is me who should apologise; I'm in an awful mood today and on other days would not have been so pompous, I hope :-) And yes -- I think to some extent my determination to push myself not to accept guilt for things that aren't my fault comes from realising that guilt for imagined misdeeds is the most potent fuel for OCD, which has wrecked the pattern of my life; it is a thief of joy. When I explained one of my OCD obsessions/compulsions to a friend, they said "I can understand why that affected you but you understand it is literally absurd to have guilt from that?", and it was one of the most empowering things I've ever heard. Guilt is a burden that good people willingly shoulder and bad people willingly shirk (if they are capable of it at all). Internalising that there are more productive negative emotions to feel than unearned, secondhand guilt is a life's work for me.
rexpop 2y ago
> don't feel guilt: it's more like a moral obligation Let's not quibble. English is too imprecise for this kind of argument.

varispeed 2y ago

> I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea. Basically preying on someone's low self-esteem and impostor syndrome. It's a vile thing to do, but unfortunately businesses keep exploit workers this way. Did they believe in the idea to make shareholders buy themselves another yacht?

ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
This is a nasty accusation made without evidence.
- shrimp_emoji 2y ago
  My favorite kind
- varispeed 2y ago
  > I had a worker do some good work for low pay, because they believed in the idea.
  - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
    Yes, that's the line you quoted earlier. It's still not evidence of your accusation and it won't become that through repetition.
    - fragmede 2y ago
      by your own admission you paid them low. What evidence is needed that you paid them low when that's what you're saying that yourself?
      - ecjhdnc2025 2y ago
        It's not myself I am defending. That the developer has been paid low is a fact. The accusation is that they were paid low because they were exploitable due to their low self-esteem. This is projected onto this fact without evidence. Perhaps from bitter personal experience, but projected nevertheless.