4 ms·
I know lots of people, loved ones included who are utterly addicted to sugar-free soft drinks they will not even touch the "full fat" versions. There are no nu
by slifin 2y ago
I know lots of people, loved ones included who are utterly addicted to sugar-free soft drinks they will not even touch the "full fat" versions.
There are no nutrients there and they appear more addictive, which is why I suspect the industry was so accommodating in moving away from sugar
- bondarchuk 2y agofat??
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- soulchild77 2y agoFat as in fat models, thin controllers ;-)
- aaomidi 2y agoWe’re adding fat to soft drinks now?
- walthamstow 2y agoFull fat is a Britishism for whole milk and it's used to refer to non-diet drinks too as a way of saying full sugar. Original coke is often called 'full fat coke'.
- rsynnott 2y ago> and they appear more addictive _Massive_ citation needed, tbh. Sugar is highly addictive. (Also, I mean, even if aspartame _was_ very addictive, to some extent, well, so what? To be clear, soft drinks ~never contain the sugar alcohols that people are talking about above; the sheer volumes would have, well, undesirable digestive impact. They use aspartame, which is pretty well-understood at this point.)
- shrimp_emoji 2y agoReal sugar soda tastes like shit by comparison. It's less sweet, and it's got a sour aftertaste as the flora in your mouth begin fermenting the sugar to acid. And you get cavities and weight gain as bonuses.
- dole 2y agoDiet Coke is notorious for having higher caffeine content than its brethren. Edit: I mean, that's why I love it