4 ms·
Re entrapment, see discussion on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40916066 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40916066 - I’m reasonably sure this can be d
by p51-remorse 2y ago
Re entrapment, see discussion on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40916066 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40916066 - I’m reasonably sure this can be done in a way that isn’t entrapment.
(Though whether the 9th circuit redefines it would be a different question)
- dghlsakjg 2y agoThis is Canada. The 9th circuit is irrelevant up here