3 ms·
yeah, but it's not high performance, which was my original point. I spend a lot of time optimizing stuff developers thought was "high performance" and they're
by winrid 2y ago
yeah, but it's not high performance, which was my original point.
I spend a lot of time optimizing stuff developers thought was "high performance" and they're scanning a 100gb+ dataset on every page load.
- arp242 2y agoIf the alternative takes hours, then ~30 seconds seems high performance to me.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- winrid 2y agoDuckDB is indeed great for one off stuff. But calling 30s high performance for quantifying 60k unique values like in this case is misleading at best. I try not to mislead people. :)