4 ms·
It seems like you're assuming that the other party's goal is to deceive, bullshit, bluster, etc. Is it possible that in some cases they're talking in good fai
by CoastalCoder 2y ago
It seems like you're assuming that the other party's goal is to deceive, bullshit, bluster, etc.
Is it possible that in some cases they're talking in good faith, but using an approach to communicate or collaboration that you misunderstand?
- neilv 2y agoOr that they're misunderstanding (something about the topic, or the communication about it).
- jalapenos 2y agoI'm talking about the case I replied to, where one side explains something, and the other rejects it without reason - that's an absence of communication and collaboration. And no, usually the other party's goal is to reject change that comes from someone other than them, due to ego, arrogance, anxiety, apathy, laziness, etc.
- krageon 2y agoThe approach to communication is deception and bullshit