5 ms·
Copying isn't plagiarism. Copying and then publishing the same thing is plagiarism.
by WA 2y ago
Copying isn't plagiarism. Copying and then publishing the same thing is plagiarism.
- KoolKat23 2y agoYes, I agree with you. The author made the point about LLM's facilitating plagiarism not me. My point is, if that is his argument, then copying is the same thing (which is ridiculous of course).
- plasticchris 2y agoThe plagiarism argument is not necessarily directed at the user of the browser. Ask yourself who is doing the publishing? And how would you cite the output of an LLM if you did publish the output?
- KoolKat23 2y agoI could ask the same for the copy function, don't see how this would ever be an issue?
- freejazz 2y agoTypically I'd cite to whatever it was I copied. I've never seen any kind of writing that sourced to the copy function. Have you?
- KoolKat23 2y agoAnd you can cite the LLM you've used, no different to citing a quote by a person.
- KoolKat23 2y agoAnd to answer your other question of how, There's plenty of documentation on that directly from the source (openai, etc.) and elsewhere. https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt https://apastyle.apa.org/blog/how-to-cite-chatgpt
- plasticchris 2y agoPrecisely the point, you cite the model and that’s it. Even when these models are known in some cases to reproduce training text directly.
- KoolKat23 2y agoHumans are known to do that too?