4 ms·
At least as of a year ago, pumped hydro was cost competitive with lithium ion batteries and filled the 10 hour niche. The other benefits are longer lifespan and
by energy123 2y ago
At least as of a year ago, pumped hydro was cost competitive with lithium ion batteries and filled the 10 hour niche. The other benefits are longer lifespan and domestic construction.
Lithium ion batteries filled the sub-10 hour niche.
But lithium ion battery costs will keep falling and pumped hydro costs won't fall or will increase alongside rising labour costs and gutted state capacity. So there could be a crossover point if it hasn't already happened.
- AndrewDavis 2y ago> But lithium ion battery costs will keep falling I question whether increased demand for grid scale batteries will create so much demand that lithium won't drop significantly any time soon. I certainly hope i'm wrong.
- energy123 2y agoThe opposite may happen. Batteries follow a learning curve where the price drops exponentially in volume. High demand means a larger industry which means more scale benefits and cheaper prices. Solar panels could be a comparison. Demand has been growing exponentially but this has actually pushed prices down because this demand drive the learning curve.
- lucianbr 2y agoOr maybe the prices are being pushed down by the chinese government? I remember reading some news about how european governments are upset over this. In general, I wonder how much do we really know when we talk about cause and effect in economics. We see prices going down. We attribute it to something. But without experiments, how can we be sure?
- energy123 2y agoWe see it in other goods like lightbulbs. Economies of scale is understood. The learning curve for solar/batteries has been stable for almost 50 years. A small part of the price declines is due to subsidies from the Chinese government but I don't believe it's the best explanation for the 97% price drop. But if you can answer the question "how much would batteries go up in price next year if China removed subsidies", I'd genuinely like to know the answer to that because it is important. One risk is a war between the US and China, regardless of the subsidy question. So we should get good at domestic alternatives like compressed air and pumped hydro, and work towards our own manufacturing of batteries.
- bobthepanda 2y agoWhile that’s happening, we don’t for example see the Chinese pushing down the prices of nuclear in the same fashion, so it isn’t just that.
- dalyons 2y agoGrid storage is somewhat close to moving away from lithium. Sodium ion and iron batteries are in production and ramping up
- femto 2y agoRemember that energy and power are distinct quantities. A battery can easily match the power output of pumped hydro, but pumped hydro can exceed the energy storage of even the largest battery. The energy storage of pumped hydro is only limited by the size of the lakes, and lake size is only loosely linked to cost since the lake will potentially already exist. If a lake is artificial, volume increases non-linearly as a dam gets higher. For example, the largest batteries can currently store about 3GWh of energy, but Snowy 2.0 will store abut 350GWh. Smaller pumped hydro schemes are typically 8GWh up.
- energy123 2y agoPumped hydro is suited for wind storage, and lithium ion is suited for solar storage, is a good approximation. Snowy 2.0 with 2.2GW power and 350GWh energy will be great for multi-day wind surplus followed by multi-day dunkelflaute. But not as useful for solar, which is more stable, and where the droughts are seasonal in nature rather than weekly.