3 ms·
> It's big because it's going from the bigger plug to the smaller plug. A dumb adapter would be the same size. No. Here is Tesla's CCS to J3400 dumb adapter. I
by peutetre 2y ago
> It's big because it's going from the bigger plug to the smaller plug. A dumb adapter would be the same size.
No. Here is Tesla's CCS to J3400 dumb adapter. It is smaller, simpler, and works: https://shop.tesla.com/product/ccs-combo-1-adapter?web=true https://shop.tesla.com/product/ccs-combo-1-adapter?web=true
> What makes you think I don't accept this?
Everything you have said up to this point.
- Dylan16807 2y ago> No. Here is Tesla's CCS to J3400 dumb adapter. It is smaller, simpler, and works: https://shop.tesla.com/product/ccs-combo-1-adapter?web=true https://shop.tesla.com/product/ccs-combo-1-adapter?web=true There is no technical reason the adapter in the video wasn't this size (assuming it supports the same current). Adding a chip does not require it to be bigger than this. I don't know why that one was bigger, but it wasn't the active/passive distinction. > Everything you have said up to this point. How so? Do you think I'm arguing this because I'm a Tesla fanboy and want the win to go to them? I assure you that's not the case. I just think plug matters more than protocol as a general statement for EV charging. Please explain how CCS being a definitive winner affects a single thing I have said.
- peutetre 2y agoHere is Tesla's CHAdeMO to Tesla protocol adapter. It's big, clumsy, and they've stopped selling it: https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/chademo-adapter-manual-in-english.pdf https://www.tesla.com/sites/default/files/chademo-adapter-ma... Here's a CCS to CHAdeMO adapter. It's big, clumsy, and expensive: https://evniculus.eu/products/adapter-ccs2-to-chademo-for-nissan-leaf https://evniculus.eu/products/adapter-ccs2-to-chademo-for-ni...